Hi Christopher,

I was somewhat surprised as well to find the pre-release version of
gfortran in Fedora 42.

sudo dnf install gcc14-gfortran.x86_64
 will recover gfortran-14.2.1 for you, which is then invoked with:

pault@fedora:~/prs/pr101047$ gfortran-14 --version
GNU Fortran (GCC) 14.2.1 20250210 (Red Hat 14.2.1-8)

Regards

Paul


On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 at 04:14, ZAPART CHRISTOPHER ANDREW <
chris.zap...@nao.ac.jp> wrote:

> Hi Jerry,
>
> Thank you very much. Hopefully there won't be any other issues to complain
> about.
>
> I will re-test the compilation once Fedora 42 upgrades its gcc / gfortran
> toolchain to the one containing your fixes (yes it will take *SOME*
> time). Probably in gcc/gfortran 15.1? Or maybe Intel Clear Linux will
> update their gcc/gfortran before Fedora. Anyway, thank you!
>
> Best regards,
> Chris
>
> 2025/04/17 12:06、Jerry D <jvdelis...@gmail.com>のメール:
>
> On 4/16/25 6:48 PM, ZAPART CHRISTOPHER ANDREW wrote:
>
> Sorry don’t have a bugzilla account yet. For completeness here is a full
> test code that also calls a pure subroutine from within a “block” located
> inside a “do concurrent” loop.
> Regards,
> Chris
> gfortran -march=native -g -Ofast -fPIC -fno-finite-math-only -funroll-
> loops -ftree-vectorize -fopenmp -o test_concurrent_fixed_array
> test_concurrent_fixed_array.f90
> test_concurrent_fixed_array.f90:
> --- snip ---
>
>
> I have confirmed that the patch provided by Steve in PR119836 does allow
> the test case mentioned here to compile and execute. (I have made no effort
> to confirm the resulting output.)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jerry
>
>
>

Reply via email to