Hi Christopher, I was somewhat surprised as well to find the pre-release version of gfortran in Fedora 42.
sudo dnf install gcc14-gfortran.x86_64 will recover gfortran-14.2.1 for you, which is then invoked with: pault@fedora:~/prs/pr101047$ gfortran-14 --version GNU Fortran (GCC) 14.2.1 20250210 (Red Hat 14.2.1-8) Regards Paul On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 at 04:14, ZAPART CHRISTOPHER ANDREW < chris.zap...@nao.ac.jp> wrote: > Hi Jerry, > > Thank you very much. Hopefully there won't be any other issues to complain > about. > > I will re-test the compilation once Fedora 42 upgrades its gcc / gfortran > toolchain to the one containing your fixes (yes it will take *SOME* > time). Probably in gcc/gfortran 15.1? Or maybe Intel Clear Linux will > update their gcc/gfortran before Fedora. Anyway, thank you! > > Best regards, > Chris > > 2025/04/17 12:06、Jerry D <jvdelis...@gmail.com>のメール: > > On 4/16/25 6:48 PM, ZAPART CHRISTOPHER ANDREW wrote: > > Sorry don’t have a bugzilla account yet. For completeness here is a full > test code that also calls a pure subroutine from within a “block” located > inside a “do concurrent” loop. > Regards, > Chris > gfortran -march=native -g -Ofast -fPIC -fno-finite-math-only -funroll- > loops -ftree-vectorize -fopenmp -o test_concurrent_fixed_array > test_concurrent_fixed_array.f90 > test_concurrent_fixed_array.f90: > --- snip --- > > > I have confirmed that the patch provided by Steve in PR119836 does allow > the test case mentioned here to compile and execute. (I have made no effort > to confirm the resulting output.) > > Thanks, > > Jerry > > >