I think it is
On Apr 4, 2025 at 2:40 PM +0800, NightStrike <nightstr...@gmail.com>, wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 2:02 PM NightStrike <nightstr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 11:04 AM NightStrike <nightstr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Between GCC 9 and 10, the following code now errors out:
> > >
> > > integer function fcn(x)
> > > implicit none
> > > integer, intent(in) :: x
> > > fcn = x * '0100'X
> > > end function fcn
> > >
> > > Error: BOZ constant at (1) uses nonstandard postfix syntax [see
> > > '-fno-allow-invalid-boz']
> > > Compiler returned: 1
> > >
> > > First, the error message is wrong regarding the option to go see:
> > >
> > > gfortran: error: unrecognized command-line option
> > > '-fno-allow-invalid-boz'; did you mean '-fallow-invalid-boz'?
> > >
> > > Second, that option doesn't protect against the aforementioned case.
> > >
> > > Third, and the main point of this email I guess, is that the
> > > porting-to page should mention this:
> > > https://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/gcc-10/porting_to.html
> > >
> > > It talks about argument mismatches, but it doesn't talk about BOZ
> > > literals in expressions, which used to be (perhaps incorrectly)
> > > accepted. There is no new command line option to accept this legacy
> > > code, so the webpage should be updated at a minimum.
> >
> > Should I open a bugzilla PR about this?
>
> Is this email list still active? :)
