Hi all,
the backport to gcc-14 has been committed as: gcc-14.2.0-996-gf955c5b409a
Regards,
Andre
On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 13:33:37 +0100
Andre Vehreschild <ve...@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> well, I had those might complicated patches bit my mightily. So let's hope for
> the best :-)
>
> Thanks for the review. Committed with your proposed change in the testcase as
> gcc-15-8642-ga5c69abf138
>
> Thanks again,
> Andre
>
> On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 10:40:11 +0000
> Paul Richard Thomas <paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Andre,
> >
> > Gosh, that's a mighty complicated patch :-) I suggest changing the comment
> > in the test case:
> >
> > s/Check that components of procedure pointer aren't freeed./Do not free
> > procedure pointer components/ or some such.
> >
> > OK for mainline and, I propose, 14-branch.
> >
> > Regards and thanks
> >
> > Paul
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 at 09:38, Andre Vehreschild <ve...@gmx.de> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > attached patch fixes freeing of procedure pointers that are stored in a
> > > derived
> > > type's component. GFortran did that already for polymorphic types but
> > > missed
> > > out on the others.
> > >
> > > Regtested ok on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu / F41. Ok for mainline?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Andre
> > > --
> > > Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de
> > >
>
>
> --
> Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de
--
Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de
