The test was disabled/XFAIL'd informally in r0-100012-gcdc6637d7c78ec,
but r15-3890-g34bf6aa41ba539 didn't realize this, causing a FAIL.
Fix that by marking it as XFAIL per the original intent.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR fortran/35779
PR fortran/116858
* gfortran.dg/initialization_25.f90: Mark as XFAIL.
---
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/initialization_25.f90 | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/initialization_25.f90
b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/initialization_25.f90
index c8edb163be04..cae3bbd27d53 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/initialization_25.f90
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/initialization_25.f90
@@ -5,8 +5,8 @@
! Dick Hendrickson <dick DOT hendrickson AT gmail DOT com>
!
! Initial patch was reverted as it broke nested loops (see
initialization_26.f90).
-!
+! XFAIL is for PR35779
! INTEGER :: J1
-! INTEGER,PARAMETER :: I2(10) = (/(J1,J1=its_bad,1,-1)/) ! { dg-error "does
not reduce" }
+! INTEGER,PARAMETER :: I2(10) = (/(J1,J1=its_bad,1,-1)/) ! { dg-error "does
not reduce" { xfail *-*-* } }
END
--
2.46.2
