Hi Harald, thanks for the review. Comitted as gcc-15-2911-g54be14bfd6e.
Do you have time for reviewing the pr110033 fix? See here: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2024-August/060814.html Yes, it looks lengthy, but it is always the same propagation of the corank and bit of meat in the second part of the patch. This would then allow to get the dependencies of the ASSOCIATE-PR to zero. Thanks again and regards, Andre On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 18:29:31 +0200 Harald Anlauf <anl...@gmx.de> wrote: > Hi Andre, > > Am 13.08.24 um 15:15 schrieb Andre Vehreschild: > > Hi all, > > > > attached patch is the last one the meta-bug 87477 ASSOCIATE depends on. The > > resolution was already given in the PR, so I just beautified it and made > > patch for it. I tried to come up with a testcase as well as Harald has, but > > had no luck with it. I see less harm in reseting the flag in the error case > > than not to do it. > > this is much simpler than Berhhard's patch while functionally equivalent > and good for mainline. > > Thanks for taking care of the issue! > > Harald > > > Regtests ok on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu / Fedora 39. Ok for mainline? > > > > Regards, > > Andre > > -- > > Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de > -- Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de
