On 01.06.23 12:59, Mikael Morin wrote:
The latter paragraph seems more an answer to the question "why is it
critical for gfortran to get funding" than "why is it critical for a
funding body to choose gfortran"?
Good point :-)
One idea about the latter question:
so that there is always a free solution:
- for engineers to make best usage of the hardware available to them
without hassle and spend their time at what they are best: making science
- for decades-old proven science codes to be adapted to current
parallel computing architecture
So gfortran remains a viable alternative to existing commercial
compilers.
Best regards
Thomas
