Paul, I've just tested physically Foresight 2 Alpha 3 on my desktop test PC and it has managed to install well but after the first boot it already proposes updates, knowing it's an alpha build, i'm doing a backup image of the disk to avoid having to reinstall it. So after the backup image is finished, should i accept the updates proposed by PackageKit ? To spend more time on Foresight 2, this afternoon i will replace my Fedora LVM partition by a fresh install of Foresight 2 Alpha 3 on my Dell Precision M90 which has already seen Foresight 1. I hope it won't break too much and i will come on #foresight to talk about it. See you later on IRC.
2008/2/16, Paul Cutler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Jason - I do think Alpha 3 is ready for testing for average users. > I'm not an overly technical user, and in the 3 months I've been > testing since Alpha 1, it's only broke hard twice (a PAM error that > made me put in a LiveCD to fix, and then this week's GNOME-panel not > appearing, which is in process of being fixed). > > We'd love more testers, and 2.0 has been exceptionally stable. We'd > probably be preparing for Beta 1 if we had more packages ported. > > Paul > > On Feb 16, 2008 2:55 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, all. > > > > I wanted to check the status of Foresight 2.0. In particular, I wanted to > > know if it's ready for average users to test. What do you all think? > > > > Thanks. > > > > Jason _______________________________________________ Foresight-distro mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rpath.org/mailman/listinfo/foresight-distro
