On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Brian Hansen <[email protected]>wrote:
> I have been using FOP 1.0, but never mind, I have just fallin in love > with wkhtmltopdf - the static version produces links inside the PDF > file and the result is so much better than FOP. > > Thanks, but I wont be using FOP any longer I think the result from > wkhtmltopdf is much better, even with the problems with Arabic fonts. > It can't be better since FOP 1.0 never supported Arabic. You are comparing apples and oranges. If you wish to try FOP with Arabic, use a version that supports it. Otherwise, you are wasting our time. Whatever.
