Hi Jason, I don't think anyone has, or if they have, they haven't published it to the community.
Hope that helps, Mehdi On 8 November 2012 09:53, Jason Harrop <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Mehdi > > Thanks for your reply. I'm happy I can write configuration code for > current SVN head. But my question is whether anyone has produced/shared > configuration code which works with both current SVN head, and FOP 1.1 ie > using reflection as necessary. > > If not, we may just wait for the next release of FOP, and support only > that. > > thanks .. Jason > > > > On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 8:44 PM, Mehdi Houshmand <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Jason, >> >> The backwards incompatibility of this API has been discussed quite a lot, >> and I'm sorry you're having these issues. If you're looking for examples >> for how to configure the new FopFactory, I'd say look in the source [1], >> there are plenty of examples on how to do it, there's also quite a bit of >> information on the wiki [2]. >> >> Sorry for the inconvenience, >> >> Mehdi >> >> [1] >> http://svn.eu.apache.org/viewvc/xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/examples/embedding/java/embedding/ >> [2] http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/FopFactoryConfiguration >> >> >> On 8 November 2012 01:54, Jason Harrop <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I maintain the docx4j project >>> >>> I reported https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54094 which >>> was apparently fixed in July, but didn't make it into FOP 1.1 (just >>> released). >>> >>> So, I thought I'd test a FOP nightly (20121107) to verify it has been >>> fixed. >>> >>> But config seems to have changed extensively post 1.1 >>> >>> Post 1.1, I can see FopFactoryBuilder, mentioned at >>> http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/FopFactoryConfiguration which >>> contains >>> >>> public FopFactoryBuilder setConfiguration(Configuration cfg) { >>> fopFactoryConfigBuilder.setConfiguration(cfg); >>> return this; >>> } >>> >>> but that class didn't make it into 1.1 (it has FopFactoryConfigurator) >>> >>> So, Is it feasible/sensible to try to be interchangeable between FOP 1.1 >>> and whatever is to come? Has someone written code which facilitates this? >>> >>> Please excuse if there are posts on this topic already. >>> >>> thanks .. Jason >>> >>> >>> >> >
