Thanks for confirming that Chris.
I can no longer wait for the definitive answer on this issue and will
proceedwith revamping our process w.r.t. colours in fo and pdf.
Cheers,
rjs
PS. If it is a change in fop-1.1 I highly recommend it be mentioned
(perhaps even high-lighted) in the release notes.
rj.
On 09/03/2012 08:37 AM, Chris Bowditch wrote:
On 31/08/2012 21:52, rsargent wrote:
Chris,
I'm not sure how to read this. Are you endorsing string-replace as
the way
to go to get cmyk into the pdf or was that meant to be tongue-in-cheek?
No I certainly was not endorsing string replace. I was intending to
endorse the rgb-icc function.
I was about to switch over to using rgb-icc since we have two colour
profiles in play. If you're suggesting that string-replace is
preferrable,
then I really have to get the correct(ed) strings from somebody.
Thanks,
Chris
Chris Bowditch wrote
Definitely the right way to use FOP though :-)
Chris
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-fop.1065347.n5.nabble.com/Does-FOP-1-1rc1-change-handling-of-RGB-values-tp36690p36735.html
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
