> Since it comes for free, I do not see good reasons for not using FLUID_LOG 
> macro also into those missing points. 

I don't see good reasons for keeping it. IMO it's redundant and could be 
removed. Yet, I would accept a PR where FLUID_LOG is called everywhere. But you 
should add one of those "good reasons" as comment pointing out why to keep and 
use the macro rather than a direct function call. Otherwise it might get 
removed in a future cleanup.

And "removing logging completely" is not quite the reasoning I was hoping for, 
as it raises the question why anyone should do that.

Tom




_______________________________________________
fluid-dev mailing list
fluid-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev

Reply via email to