2017-11-13 11:33 GMT+01:00 Kjetil Matheussen <k.s.matheus...@gmail.com>:
> 1. Ladspa is set in stone. It has mostly been replaced by lv2 now. (lv2
> stands for ladspa v2.)
> 2. ladspa.h can't change too much because then the plugins would have to
> be recompiled.
> 3. It wouldn't make sense to change ladspa.h if it was included in
> fluidsynth. So it wouldn't be a fork.
> 4. If ladspa.h "upstream" would change in a way that would force plugins
> to be recompiled (and this won't happen),
> the only required change in fluidsynth would be to update the ladspa.h
> file.
>
I second that. LADSPA development hasn't been just stalled, it is basically
"finished". As Kjetil says, all new stuff goes into LV2.
And the fact that projects like Ardour, Audacity and Csound all bundle
their own copy of the ladspa.h header makes me even more confident that
this a good idea. Especially as we are now also sort-of-supporting WIndows,
where people can't just "apt-get install ladspa-sdk" to get it to compile
properly.
Cheers,
Marcus
_______________________________________________
fluid-dev mailing list
fluid-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev
