If you have not seen this before, there is a little trick I use for my old
slow netbook -- halving the sample rate with the flag '-r22050'.

http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/fluidsynth/wiki/ExampleCommandLines



On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Aere Greenway <a...@dvorak-keyboards.com>wrote:

> **
> Pedro, and all:
>
> It's interesting from your point of view, that the problem happens on
> older, less capable machines, because of their floating-point handling, as
> well as because of having to reduce the polyphony to avoid excessive
> processing overhead.
>
> So I guess the older machines get hit by it both ways at once.  I know of
> the problem because I actually test my courseware on older, less capable
> machines.
>
> It is actually a promotional point for my offering, that you can take a
> machine that is gathering dust in the basement (because it won't run modern
> versions of Windows), and turn it into a wonderful music workstation.
>
> I can still demonstrate this successfully using a 450 megahertz HP Vectra
> machine with only 384 megabytes of RAM.
>
> As I think more about the problem, from what you said, I wonder if the
> problem I noticed, and the problem you reported (that David fixed), are
> actually the same problem.  Perhaps it was something else fixed in that
> later version that fixed my problem.
>
> I observed my problem on faster, more capable machines as well.  It
> definitely happened on my Dell Dimension 1100 machine, which has an
> Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU of 2.53 gigahertz.
>
> I also observed that applying the re-packaged (altered
> version-designation) PPA fix (originally for Ubuntu 11.10) solved the
> problem, in that the very poor quality sound (where random new notes are
> dropped altogether, or sound only very briefly) does not occur with the PPA
> version of libfluidsynth1.
>
> The problem also happened on my Acer Aspire laptop (which has two Celeron
> (R) processors of 2.0 GHz, but uses 64-bit architecture.  That was observed
> on Ubuntu 11.10 (I have not yet converted that machine to 12.04).  Again,
> the PPA fix (which was just a later version of libfluidsynth1), made the
> problem's symptoms no longer appear.
>
> In fact, none of the machines I own - even the fastest and most capable,
> are immune from the problem.
>
> But that being said, I tend to purchase computer hardware from the
> trailing edge of the technology curve, and Linux has prolonged their
> usefulness - perhaps indefinitely (though with some of the later releases,
> I am beginning to have my doubts).
>
> - Aere
>
>
> On Mon, 2012-05-28 at 15:56 +0200, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wednesday 23 May 2012, David Henningsson wrote:
> > FluidSynth upstream) didn't make a bug fix release either. Perhaps we
> > should do that some time soon...so that the fixes will go into 12.10 at
> > least...
>
> I'm not sure if only fixing that particular bug justifies a release. It
> doesn't harm to do it, of course. But we may face very similar bugs in the
> future. Let me explain.
>
> I've found the bug you are talking about some time ago, while I was working
> with fluidsynth for a Nokia device having an ARM 
> processor:http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/fluidsynth/ticket/100
>
> This bug was solved by David with this 
> patch:http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/fluidsynth/changeset/435
>
> The problem was very specific to lowering the polyphony, but the cause was not
> uncommon and had plagued FluidSynth for a long time. The root problem is
> denormals in floating point 
> calculations:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denormal_number
>
> To show a similar problem, here is a simple test scenario.
>
> 1.- Sample MIDI file: http://www.miditrax.com/Aug/salsa.mid
> 2.- GeneralUser GS Soundfont: http://www.schristiancollins.com/generaluser.php
> 3.- Build FluidSynth (SVN head, or any previous release) in debug mode with
> floats instead of doubles and FPE checks:
>
> $ cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug \
>         -Denable-debug=on \
>         -Denable-floats=on \
>         -Denable-fpe-check=on
>
> Runtime results on an AMD Athlon(tm) XP processor:
>
> fluidsynth: warning: FPE exception (before or in voice_write vol env):
> Underflow
> fluidsynth: warning: FPE exception (before or in voice_write vol env):
> Denormal number
> fluidsynth: warning: FPE exception (before or in voice_filter): Underflow
> fluidsynth: warning: FPE exception (before or in voice_write vol env):
> Denormal number Underflow
> fluidsynth: warning: FPE exception (before or in voice_write vol env):
> Denormal number
> fluidsynth: warning: FPE exception (before or in voice_filter): Denormal
> number Underflow
>
> When running FS in some old CPUs, denormals penalize CPU performance and sound
> quality, while in modern CPUs these denormal numbers are automatically fixed
> in hardware, eliminating the problem.
>
> My oldest machine is the only one I can access today, which is (slightly)
> affected by denormals in FluidSynth:
>
> $ cat /proc/cpuinfo
> processor       : 0
> vendor_id       : AuthenticAMD
> cpu family      : 6
> model           : 10
> model name      : AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2800+
> stepping        : 0
> cpu MHz         : 2086.903
> cache size      : 512 KB
> fdiv_bug        : no
> hlt_bug         : no
> f00f_bug        : no
> coma_bug        : no
> fpu             : yes
> fpu_exception   : yes
> cpuid level     : 1
> wp              : yes
> flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca
> cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr sse syscall mmxext 3dnowext 3dnow up
> bogomips        : 4173.80
> clflush size    : 32
> cache_alignment : 32
> address sizes   : 34 bits physical, 32 bits virtual
> power management: ts
>
> My other machines with Intel processors (Core2Duo, Core-i7) implementing SSE2
> instructions are immune. However, you can tell the GCC compiler to not use the
> SSE2 instructions with this flag: -mno-sse2
>
> $ cmake ... -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS=-mno-sse2 ...
>
> The above configuration allows some FPU exceptions to be reported on runtime,
> even in a modern CPU. I would like to know if somebody is able to reproduce my
> test results and help fixing them.
>
> Regards,
> Pedro
>
> _______________________________________________
> fluid-dev mailing 
> listfluid-dev@nongnu.orghttps://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev
>
>
>   --
>
> Sincerely,
> Aere
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> fluid-dev mailing list
> fluid-dev@nongnu.org
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
fluid-dev mailing list
fluid-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev

Reply via email to