Just a follow up on this, a test from the jOrgan user using the SFZ sf2 player as a comparison to fluidsynth:
------------- I repeated the same tests as fluidsynth with SFZ. To do this: - A disposition (without fluidsynth) with two "continuous filter" for the reverb (CC91) and chorus (CC93), and output to "Generic Sound" MIDI Yoke NT: 1; - SFZ.exe, MIDI Yoke NT: 1; - In SFZ, a soundfont for testing; - Finally Viena to change the soundfont. After each change the soundfont with viena must reload the soundfont in SFS to reflect the changes. Results: (I = Instrument, P = Preset) 1) I = 100%, P = 0, P = 50, P = 100%: total efficiency of CC91 and CC93. 2) I = 0%, P = 0, P = 50, P = 100%: total efficiency of CC91 and CC93. 3) I = 60%, P = 0, P = 50, P = 100%: total efficiency of CC91 and CC93. -------------------- So the question is: what should the behavior be? If CC91 is to always have an effect on the reverb (like it does with Creative and SFZ), then there is a bug in fludisynth. Kind regards, GrahamG _______________________________________________ fluid-dev mailing list fluid-dev@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev
