On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 10:35 -0700, j...@resonance.org wrote: > Hello FluidSynth developers and users, > > I will be moving FluidSynth services off of the resonance.org domain. > I wanted to ask if there are any opinions or ideas on options for the > various hosted components of the FluidSynth project. It seems like > some conglomeration of these services might also be a good idea. > > Hosted components of the FluidSynth project: > - Trac web site interface > - SVN server > - File download area > - fluid-dev mailing list > > I think that pretty much covers it. I noticed that SourceForge.net > now has Trac support, as well as git (if we ever want to move to that > instead of SVN). SourceForge seems to be looking fairly nice these > days and my only real objection is the advertising. It seems to be > fairly focused on software related topics though, so at least its not > some random noise. I would likely move the file releases to > SourceForge and possibly also the mailing list too, just to bring it > all to one place. > > Any thoughts or opinions on this? > Hello Josh
It would be logical to migrate to Sourceforge.net since this is *the home* of literally hundreds of thousands of FOSS projects though I must say I also liked the sound of resonance.org :-) Git is after all the brainchild of Linus himself. I have not looked into an in-depth comparison between git and svn. Are there any notable practical advantages in favor of git ? Best wishes, E _______________________________________________ fluid-dev mailing list fluid-dev@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev
