On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 16:05 +0900, KO Myung-Hun wrote:
> Of course, there are many people to want to use FluidSynth on OS/2. If
> there was no people, would I port it ? In addition, FluidSynth is
> important as a lib as well as a stand-alone program. The reason I ported
> FluidSynth at first was also to use it as a lib for ScummVM, which is
> available to OS/2 already.
>
Alright, you've convinced me :) The ScummVM support for OS/2 in
particular.
> > But what's next, DOS support? ;)
> >
>
> If there is someone who could do it. ^^
>
Well, I COULD, but do I want to? FluidSynth kind of depends on a 32 bit
memory space. Porting it to some sort of protected mode DOS overlay,
isn't really high on my todo list. Ha ha.
Josh
_______________________________________________
fluid-dev mailing list
fluid-dev@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev
