lvqcl wrote:
> But the 1st patch ('1_sources.patch' file) was not applied...
When I tried apply that patch, all but one hunk succeeded. I inspected
the rejected part, but that seemed to have already been applied.
> Before this set of 4 patches, I posted a patch that tries to prevent
> unnecessary
> inclusion of windows.h -- 'use_winapi_macro.patch' file from
> <http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2016-February/005856.html> message.
That is that not this commit?
commit a5c8e8e14de182c4e8c5a8cd0b6be7c75ab6f021
Author: Erik de Castro Lopo <[email protected]>
Date: Thu Feb 4 13:42:33 2016 +1100
src/share/utf8/utf8.c: Windows API usage fixes
Patch-from: <[email protected]>
> '1_sources.patch' was made after it, and as a result 'use_winapi_macro.patch'
> must be applied before it. If you object to that patch, I can make version of
> '1_sources.patch' that is based on the current code.
Lets just get a patch that fixes what we have now.
Cheers,
Erik
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/
_______________________________________________
flac-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
