Ian Nartowicz wrote: > The Opus replaygain spec is fundamentally broken, so let's ignore that for > now. It is discussed ad nauseam elsewhere, but isn't going to change any time > soon.
;) > I agree any replaygain reference loudness tag should only apply to other > REPLAYGAIN* tags, although placing R128 gain values (adjusted by some > arbitrary amount or otherwise) in REPLAYGAIN* tags raises some interesting > questions. As already discussed none of this *requires* a reference loudness > tag, but if there is one then it may as well be parsed. Who knows, maybe it > says something useful. Lastly, and perhaps most importantly, nobody is > forcing > you to use it or apply it to your music, so you shouldn't prevent people who > want it from having it. But *if* flac will switch to R128 algorithm, what should it write to REPLAYGAIN_REFERENCE_LOUDNESS tag? "89.0 dB" or "-18 LUFS"? (or "-18 LKFS"?) _______________________________________________ flac-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
