On Jun 19, 2012 8:08 PM, "Dennis Brunnenmeyer" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Perhaps update the codec to handle 32 bit files while remaining the same otherwise?
32bit audio files? What are they used for? James. > > Dennis Brunnenmeyer > FULL FIDELITY MUSIC > ________________________________ > > On 6/19/2012 12:00 PM, [email protected] wrote: >> >> Send flac-dev mailing list submissions to >> [email protected] >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> [email protected] >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> [email protected] >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of flac-dev digest..." >> >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. Next generation WebM and FLAC (James Haigh) >> 2. Re: Next generation WebM and FLAC (Ralph Giles) >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 18:08:27 +0100 >> From: James Haigh <[email protected]> >> Subject: [flac-dev] Next generation WebM and FLAC >> To: [email protected] >> Message-ID: >> <ca+yoodbtkxwp+gmw8mrn_lwbgxkdfdkgxp_bt1wv57hgh9s...@mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> Hello, >> >> I have proposed to WebM to use FLAC in a future version. Since FLAC was >> designed a decade ago, I was wondering if there were any new compression >> techniques that FLAC could use in a new version to improve compression >> ratios. >> >> If so, it would be worth synchronising with WebM for compatibility reasons. >> >> Here's the WebM discussion: >> >> https://groups.google.com/a/webmproject.org/group/webm-discuss/browse_thread/thread/42fd53c71b2bcc74 >> >> Best regards, >> James Haigh. >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/attachments/20120619/a226dda6/attachment.html >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 2 >> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 10:18:51 -0700 >> From: Ralph Giles <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [flac-dev] Next generation WebM and FLAC >> To: James Haigh <[email protected]> >> Cc: [email protected] >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >> >> On 12-06-19 10:08 AM, James Haigh wrote: >> >>> I have proposed to WebM to use FLAC in a future version. Since FLAC was >>> designed a decade ago, I was wondering if there were any new compression >>> techniques that FLAC could use in a new version to improve compression >>> ratios. >> >> The short answer is yes, but for it to be work promoting a new standard, >> you really want to do *significantly* better than flac, like lossless at >> half the file size. That's a lot harder than an extra 10% or 20% >> compression. A great research project, in other words, but I think we'd >> do better to concentrate resources on improving support for the existing >> flac format which is very widely adopted. >> >> -r >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> flac-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev >> >> >> End of flac-dev Digest, Vol 91, Issue 4 >> *************************************** >> > > _______________________________________________ > flac-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev >
_______________________________________________ flac-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
