On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Jens Axboe <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 12/10/2015 11:27 AM, Andrey Kuzmin wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Jens Axboe <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 12/10/2015 11:17 AM, Andrey Kuzmin wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 9:15 PM, Jens Axboe <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Dec 10 2015, Andrey Kuzmin wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've also encountered a similar issue a number of times where the job
>>>>>> failed to stop (and refused to terminate in response to C-C) when a
>>>>>> thread/process fails, e.g. due to an error. My guess is that the loop
>>>>>> that waits for completions doesn't check for td->terminate being set.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Attach with gdb and see what they are doing, could be a missing
>>>>> terminate check. Or it could already be sitting waiting for
>>>>> completions.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It just sits there waiting for completions, as gdb understandably
>>>> predominantly hits the wait state.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Where is it sitting and/or looping?
>>
>>
>> unix/wait smth ;), as far as I recall.
>>
>> If you need an exact ref, let me make up an error in the code, run,
>> and get back to you with the exact gdb frame info.
>
>
> I'm generally not in the crystal ball or guessing game :-)
>
> So yeah, a stack trace would be helpful.

OK, will do.


Regards,
Andrey

>
> --
> Jens Axboe
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to