On 14-03-2020 06:11 pm, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am Sa., 14. März 2020 um 13:19 Uhr schrieb Gyan Doshi <[email protected]>:
On 14-03-2020 04:29 pm, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am Sa., 14. März 2020 um 07:31 Uhr schrieb Gyan Doshi <[email protected]>:
As per https://johnvansickle.com/ffmpeg/
---
src/download | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/download b/src/download
index 6292a7e..d9155ee 100644
--- a/src/download
+++ b/src/download
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@
<h3>Linux Static Builds</h3>
<div class="list-group">
<a class="list-group-item"
href="https://johnvansickle.com/ffmpeg/";>32-bit and
- 64-bit for kernel 2.6.32 and above</a>
+ 64-bit for kernel 3.2.0 and above</a>
Shouldn't we instead remove the line?
Why?
Because we cannot know which kernel version the binaries currently require
We know, because the provider mentions it.
Are we mentioning that the Zeranoe binaries do not work on XP?
Or on Vista, as mentioned by the provider. That should be noted.
As long as the qualifications don't get too verbose, no harm in
adding/maintaining the practice.
Gyan
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
[email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
