> 在 2020年1月31日，下午8:07，Nicolas George <[email protected]> 写道： > > Liu Steven (12020-01-31): >> for example: https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/project/ffmpeg/list/?series=250 > > Yes, I saw it shortly afterwards. Seems misguided: same result for a > protocol not found (normal behavior, must be handled) and for a clumsy > programmer. I like it better when the core functions are strict, unless > when there is a significant benefit. > > Also, it is abusing an undocumented behavior. Just more safe than without check. I think if it return -EINVAL maybe better than NULL, is it? > > Regards, > > -- > Nicolas George > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
Steven Thanks _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list [email protected] https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
