On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 2:21 AM Carl Eugen Hoyos <[email protected]> wrote: > > Am Mi., 6. Nov. 2019 um 08:28 Uhr schrieb Marton Balint <[email protected]>: > > [...] > > + if (ctx->has_alpha_channel && > > + (img->d_w != img_alpha->d_w || > > + img->d_h != img_alpha->d_h || > > + img->bit_depth != img_alpha->bit_depth)) { > > + av_log(avctx, AV_LOG_ERROR, > > + "Video dimensions %dx%d@%dbpp differ from alpha > > dimensions %dx%d@%dbpp\n", > > + img->d_w, img->d_h, img->bit_depth, > > + img_alpha->d_w, img_alpha->d_h, img_alpha->bit_depth); > > + return AVERROR_INVALIDDATA; > > Shouldn't this be "bpc" instead of "bpp"? >
I tend to use them interchangeably, but bpc may be more precise here. I sent a patch. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list [email protected] https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
