On 04.08.2019 23:52, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
It uses a nonstandard inclusion guard.

Is there any problem with just fixing the inclusion guard instead?
I forgot that this exists, but the inclusion guard in it looked fairly standard to me.
Feel free to just fix it.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
[email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to