On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 9:13 AM James Almer <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2/26/2019 10:18 PM, Chris Cunningham wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 4:46 PM Chris Cunningham > > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > I'm fine to do either. James, do you still prefer to skip the later > > headers if this breaks some old ogm files? > > > > > > James, friendly ping > > Yes, i'd prefer if we skip any superfluous parameter header that shows > up before the first data packet. > The return value of ff_codec_get_id() should also be checked to not > propagate AV_CODEC_ID_NONE, which was the source of this issue. > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel Renewing request to apply for this patch. The alternate route of identifying/skipping the bad packets was more difficult than expected (https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/patch/13593/). James signed on this approach instead. Chris _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list [email protected] https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
