On 5/5/19, Nicolas George <[email protected]> wrote: > Marton Balint (12019-05-05): >> I don't think you can insist on waiting for a review unless you plan to >> do >> it yourself in a reasonable time frame. > > Do you really think I have a duty to help Paul after all the insults he > have subjected me? Really? > > I am not the only developer here. Paul could, for example, politely ask > somebody, for example Timo who authored the rest of the file, to have a > look. > > Note: I am pushing Timo on the line here, but if anybody asks me to > review a patch they think I might be competent to review, I will gladly > do it. Anybody except Paul, who has repeatedly insulted me. > > Do you consider this unreasonable? > >> Yes, this can degrade code quality, but I guess there is a general >> assumption that people who get commit rights won't mess up too badly, and >> the gains of more/better features are considered greater than the risks >> of >> unreviewed code getting in. > > In the first thread, I noted that there was an obvious flaw in the > patch. It was not the first time. It is not an isolated incident: the > code quality has significantly degraded over the last few years: less > future planning, increasing complexity. That happens because lack of > review, amongst other things.
Stop spreading FUD! > > Regards, > > -- > Nicolas George > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list [email protected] https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
