2018-03-05 12:37 GMT+01:00, Paul B Mahol <[email protected]>: > On 3/5/18, Vasile Toncu <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Thanks for the review. I've made changes according to your guidance. >> >> It would be great to know if the community will go on with our intention >> of adding reinterlace as a alternative for tinterlace. >> >> That being said, here is the new patch. > > As already said, this is not acceptable. > > There is no point in having 2 filters with near same funcionality.
If you consider the new filter ok, the existing filter will be removed in the same push. I believe sending only the new filter makes reviewing easier. Please comment, Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list [email protected] http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
