On 20 January 2018 at 17:26, Aurelien Jacobs <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 10:54:34PM +0100, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > > 2018-01-14 14:06 GMT+01:00 Aurelien Jacobs <[email protected]>: > > > > > Well, here is an updated patch which uses codec tags for the decoder > and > > > profile for the encoder. > > > > Sorry but I object to this patch: > > We should not invent codec_tags. > > OK, I understand, and I agree. > > But now we are in an interlocking situation. > We have 2 solutions to handle aptX vs. aptX HD but those 2 solutions have > been rejected by 2 different person. > > Do anybody have a 3rd solution, that everyone would accept ? > > And if not, how do we resolve this ? > Is there any policy nowadays to handle this kind of interlocking ? > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > Fine, I see no choice but to use multiple codec IDs for aptxhd since the format really provides you with nothing bitstream wise to determine what it is. Even game codecs have a bit or two for version. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list [email protected] http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
