On 5/1/17, Muhammad Faiz <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Kyle Swanson <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 3:18 AM, Paul B Mahol <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 4/30/17, Nicolas George <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Le primidi 11 floreal, an CCXXV, Muhammad Faiz a ecrit : >>>>> Are you working on these? Because currently I'm not. >>>> >>>> There is nothing to work on yet: the message you answer to is raising a >>>> question about the global design of the internal API. That question >>>> needs an answer before any work can be done, and I can not decide alone. >>>> >>> >>> How nice, introducing bug that causes crash and then claiming there is >>> not such bug. >>> >>> Which filters you consider deemed worthy to not crash? >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ffmpeg-devel mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel >> >> Maybe 383057f8e744efeaaa3648a59bc577b25b055835 should be reverted >> until API stuff is sorted. This should also be backported to 3.3 >> because these issues are present in that release. >> >> Kyle > > Of course no. Reverting it will make more bug. > > Unless > https://lists.ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2017-January/206285.html > and > https://lists.ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2017-January/206284.html > are also applied.
One of those are already reviewed, other looks like is not needed at all. Could you elaborate why it is needed? _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list [email protected] http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
