On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 03:19:48AM +0000, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: > The soxr resampler is slower and worse than the swr resampler, > hence drop the former. > > Signed-off-by: Rostislav Pehlivanov <[email protected]> > --- > Changelog | 1 + > MAINTAINERS | 1 - > configure | 5 +- > doc/resampler.texi | 53 ++++----------- > libswresample/Makefile | 1 - > libswresample/options.c | 7 -- > libswresample/resample.c | 2 +- > libswresample/soxr_resample.c | 130 > ------------------------------------ > libswresample/swresample.c | 18 +---- > libswresample/swresample.h | 7 -- > libswresample/swresample_internal.h | 9 +-- > 11 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 213 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 libswresample/soxr_resample.c
the way soxr resamples is different from how swr implements it, that could result in different advantages and disadvantages. I would expect "which is better" to depend on what is meassured i also think this should be CC-ed to rob, thus adding him to CC [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety -- Benjamin Franklin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list [email protected] http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
