On 29.10.2016 12:03, Clément Bœsch wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 11:05:06PM +0200, Clément Bœsch wrote:
>> ---
>> Not sure if the chunk is even needed
I'm not sure either.
>> ---
>> ffmpeg.c | 5 ++---
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/ffmpeg.c b/ffmpeg.c
>> index 3b91710..e8088c0 100644
>> --- a/ffmpeg.c
>> +++ b/ffmpeg.c
>> @@ -2317,10 +2317,9 @@ static int decode_video(InputStream *ist, AVPacket
>> *pkt, int *got_output, int eo
>> }
>>
>> frame_sample_aspect= av_opt_ptr(avcodec_get_frame_class(),
>> decoded_frame, "sample_aspect_ratio");
>> + if (!frame_sample_aspect->num)
>> + *frame_sample_aspect = ist->st->sample_aspect_ratio;
>> for (i = 0; i < ist->nb_filters; i++) {
This is only entered for 'ist->nb_filters > 0', so to preserve the current
behavior,
you'd need to add a check for that.
>> - if (!frame_sample_aspect->num)
>> - *frame_sample_aspect = ist->st->sample_aspect_ratio;
>> -
>> if (i < ist->nb_filters - 1) {
>> f = ist->filter_frame;
>> err = av_frame_ref(f, decoded_frame);
Otherwise this is probably OK.
Best regards,
Andreas
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
