Sorry about the second patch I sent. This option is for flexibility since some apps may not want to use the hidden atoms.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Robert Krüger <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 9:54 PM, Dave Rice <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > On Oct 13, 2016, at 1:56 PM, Hendrik Leppkes <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > Am 13.10.2016 19:03 schrieb "liangsi" <[email protected]>: > > >> > > >> --- > > >> libavformat/isom.h | 1 + > > >> libavformat/mov.c | 5 ++++- > > >> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > >> > > > > > > Can you elaborate on the reasons of why someone would want this? > > Preferably > > > in the commit message for future consideration. > > > > Shouldn't using the moov atom that is not detected within a free atom be > > the default? Can you elaborate on the reasons of why someone wouldn't > want > > this? > > Dave > > > > +1 > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list [email protected] http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
