On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 05:27:19PM +0200, wm4 wrote: > > Musl merely showed you the problem and now you are suggesting to "document > > that the messenger with his bad news about our health is no longer welcome". > > musl could also choose to abandon its incredibly "clever" hack (that > makes almost everyone who sees it go "WTF"), and, as was pointed our on
:-D IOW it exposes the _bugs_ in how people are accustomed to reason. > IRC, probably increase the efficiency and readability of the code in > question. Yes, musl is technically in the right, but only technically. Is your opinion (about efficiency) sufficiently well informed? No offence but I assume you to be a mutimedia guru, not a standard library expert, which the author of the code is. We shall not blindly accept authority of course. If you have a suggestion for improvement, given a reasonable ground it would be useful on the musl mailing list. Here and without a real ground it looks like a FUD. As for readability, it is your personal opinion. Again: no offence! Standard libraries are just a quite different area, it postulated other skills and presents other implementation challenges than multimedia programming. Friendly regards, Rune _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list [email protected] http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
