Clément Bœsch <u <at> pkh.me> writes:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 01:07:09PM +0000, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> > Clément Bœsch <u <at> pkh.me> writes:
> >
> > > +static int pgmyuv_probe(AVProbeData *p)
> > > +{
> > > + int ret = pgmx_probe(p);
> > > + return ret && av_match_ext(p->filename, "pgmyuv") ? ret : 0;
> >
> > You could add a comment that this format was invented within
> > FFmpeg, I hadn't realized this.
>
> I'm not sure the probe code is really the best place to do
> that but added locally anyway
Thank you!
I was a little surprised why the extension is used to distinguish.
> > And you could check for positive resolutions if you want to
> > improve probing.
>
> Yeah, probing could be improved, but it requires some line
> skipping logic (empty lines, comments, etc) I wasn't that
> motivated to write (probably due to a traumatic history with
> text subtitles).
Then please ignore;-)
> > Did you run the probe test for the new functions?
>
> Should I pass special parameters?
You don't have to (the test passed), if you add the name
of the demuxer you want to test, it runs faster.
Thank you, Carl Eugen
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
