On 6 April 2016 at 12:04, Rostislav Pehlivanov <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 6 April 2016 at 06:45, Clément Bœsch <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> Mmh. That's nice and all but... why not use/adjust the native ebur128
>> filter we have instead of relying on an external library?
>>
>>
> What's worse is that this patch is around 1100 lines of code but the
> library is around 1300 lines (which from a quick look can be trimmed down
> to around 1/4 of that) and the library depends on libspeex.

speexdsp* and it's not required, from what I can tell.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to