On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 01:42:52PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 10:37:42AM +0100, Moritz Barsnick wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 22:24:08 +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > + if (sscanf(str, "HandBrake %d.%d.%d", &major, &minor,
> > > µ) == 3) {
> > > + c->handbrake_version = 1000000*major + 1000*minor +
> > > micro;
> > [...]
> > > + if (mov->handbrake_version &&
> > > + mov->handbrake_version <= 1000000*0 + 1000*10 + 0 &&
> >
> > Really hard to read for all the '1's and '0'. You're checking for "<=
> > 0.10.0"? Perhaps better to clearly document that.
>
> comment added
>
>
> >
> > So starting with 0.10.1, behavior is different?
>
> we have a file from 0.10.0 which is affected, i do not know if
> later versions are affected, if somone knows or someone submits
> files from later versions which are affected then this can be
> updatedapplied thanks [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Let us carefully observe those good qualities wherein our enemies excel us and endeavor to excel them, by avoiding what is faulty, and imitating what is excellent in them. -- Plutarch
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list [email protected] http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
