On 9/3/2025 3:47 PM, Michael Niedermayer via ffmpeg-devel wrote: > Hi Derek > > On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 02:19:28PM +0100, Derek Buitenhuis via ffmpeg-devel > wrote: >> On 9/3/2025 2:06 PM, Michael Niedermayer via ffmpeg-devel wrote: >>> Applied after discussion in the General Assembly. >>> There where no objections. > [...] >> Moving it to a private list because it better suits your goal is, to use >> a word you like to use: unacceptable. > > The General Assembly is the group that can override an objection or decide > in case of a dispute that doesnt fall under the TC. funding is not a techincal > matter so its not for the TC.
With a vote. > > A formal vote was not opened because not a single member asked for one or > supported the objection from vittorio. That's just not how a GA works anywhere, ever. > > But i encourage you and vittorio to publically discuss your objections: > "I don't think any funding scheme should be authorized." > from here: > https://lists.ffmpeg.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/DYTV6QXM2KUW7QHTPLMGDQF6WXLR2YJV/ > > I belive close to 100% of FFmpeg supporters, support some funding scheme > for FFmpeg. Citation needed. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
