> -----Original Message-----
> From: ffmpeg-devel <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Marvin
> Scholz
> Sent: Freitag, 20. Juni 2025 13:30
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <[email protected]>
> Cc: Nicolas Gaullier <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] fftools/textformat: fix print 64
> bit integers
>
>
>
> On 20 Jun 2025, at 13:07, Nicolas Gaullier wrote:
>
> > Regression in ffprobe since textformat introduction
> > in d7a3f68feae0b1c3718f9d2671c6d41c60a40680.
> >
> > Fixes #11638
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Gaullier <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > fftools/textformat/avtextformat.c | 2 +-
> > fftools/textformat/avtextformat.h | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fftools/textformat/avtextformat.c
> b/fftools/textformat/avtextformat.c
> > index 14779e6f0c..14bad9022b 100644
> > --- a/fftools/textformat/avtextformat.c
> > +++ b/fftools/textformat/avtextformat.c
> > @@ -437,7 +437,7 @@ static char *value_string(const
> AVTextFormatContext *tctx, char *buf, int buf_si
> > }
> >
> >
> > -void avtext_print_unit_int(AVTextFormatContext *tctx, const char
> *key, int value, const char *unit)
> > +void avtext_print_unit_int(AVTextFormatContext *tctx, const char
> *key, int64_t value, const char *unit)
> > {
> > char val_str[128];
> > struct unit_value uv;
> > diff --git a/fftools/textformat/avtextformat.h
> b/fftools/textformat/avtextformat.h
> > index cf23d93871..8316829af5 100644
> > --- a/fftools/textformat/avtextformat.h
> > +++ b/fftools/textformat/avtextformat.h
> > @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ void avtext_print_integer(AVTextFormatContext
> *tctx, const char *key, int64_t va
> >
> > int avtext_print_string(AVTextFormatContext *tctx, const char *key,
> const char *val, int flags);
> >
> > -void avtext_print_unit_int(AVTextFormatContext *tctx, const char
> *key, int value, const char *unit);
> > +void avtext_print_unit_int(AVTextFormatContext *tctx, const char
> *key, int64_t value, const char *unit);
> >
> > void avtext_print_rational(AVTextFormatContext *tctx, const char
> *key, AVRational q, char sep);
> >
> > --
> > 2.47.2
> >
>
> Looks good.
>
> Would it be possible to add a test for this to make sure we catch such
> a regression next time?
>
> (I can also give it a try if you don't want to)
Hi Marvin and Nicolas,
tests are always good. In this case though, I'm wondering whether it
might be better to cleanup and straighten the APIs and implementations
first.
(look at the value_string() function to see what I mean).
Best regards,
sw
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
[email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
