> -----Original Message----- > From: ffmpeg-devel <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Marton > Balint Hi Marton, > As for the question of the default behaviour, I don't have a strong > opinion, both can make sense, maybe I would keep the existing behaviour > for the library, but change the default for the cli tools to no-pointer > output. I like the idea; I think I'll pick it up for the next revision. Thanks, sw _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list [email protected] https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
- Re: [FFmpeg-devel] SW's Patchsets Overview Marton Balint
- Re: [FFmpeg-devel] SW's Patchsets Overview softworkz .
- Re: [FFmpeg-devel] SW's Patchsets Overview Marton Balint
- Re: [FFmpeg-devel] SW's Patchsets Overvie... softworkz .
- Re: [FFmpeg-devel] SW's Patchsets Ove... Michael Niedermayer
- Re: [FFmpeg-devel] SW's Patchset... softworkz .
- Re: [FFmpeg-devel] SW's Patc... Michael Niedermayer
- Re: [FFmpeg-devel] SW's Patchsets Overvie... Nicolas George
- Re: [FFmpeg-devel] SW's Patchsets Ove... softworkz .
- Re: [FFmpeg-devel] SW's Patchsets Ove... Marton Balint
- Re: [FFmpeg-devel] SW's Patchset... softworkz .
- Re: [FFmpeg-devel] SW's Patchset... Nicolas George
- Re: [FFmpeg-devel] SW's Patchsets Overview softworkz .
- Re: [FFmpeg-devel] SW's Patchsets Overview softworkz .
