On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 at 10:59, Michael Niedermayer <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sponsored-by: Sovereign Tech Fund > Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <[email protected]> > --- > tools/target_enc_fuzzer.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/tools/target_enc_fuzzer.c b/tools/target_enc_fuzzer.c > index 059d7830710..59c2db4bb42 100644 > --- a/tools/target_enc_fuzzer.c > +++ b/tools/target_enc_fuzzer.c > @@ -149,6 +149,8 @@ int LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput(const uint8_t *data, size_t > size) { > av_dict_set_int(&opts, "coder", coder, 0); > av_dict_set_int(&opts, "context", bytestream2_get_byte(&gbc)&1, > 0); > av_dict_set_int(&opts, "slicecrc", bytestream2_get_byte(&gbc)&1, > 0); > + ctx->slices = bytestream2_get_byte(&gbc); > + ctx->level = bytestream2_get_byte(&gbc) % 6 - 1;
Note sure that's correct. Depending on the codec numeric level value may differ, but generally it has higher value. Like 62 for "6.2" in h264 case, or 186 for "6.2" for h265 case. I would just remove `% 6 - 1` and let fuzzer find interesting values for each codec. - Kacper > break;} > } > } > -- > 2.45.2 > > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe". _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list [email protected] https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
