On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 12:30 AM Marth64 <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think this could enable use of the highly regarded,
> QTGMC deinterlacer which sounds appealing to me
> (+1 for VapourSynth instead).
>

LOL,
Isn't there demuxer already?
Also as filter it would be less useful.



> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
>
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
[email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to