Hi, On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 7:33 AM Rémi Denis-Courmont <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Le 3 mai 2024 14:28:59 GMT+03:00, "Ronald S. Bultje" <[email protected]> > a écrit : > >Hi, > > > >On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 1:53 AM Rémi Denis-Courmont <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> Le 2 mai 2024 21:38:13 GMT+03:00, "Ronald S. Bultje" < > [email protected]> > >> a écrit : > >> >On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 1:44 PM Vittorio Giovara < > >> [email protected]> > >> >wrote: > >> >> I believe the path forward would be designing a system that can > >> accommodate > >> >> both workflows > >> > > >> >I agree with this. > >> > >> I vehemently disagree with this. > >> > >> Unless you are volunteering to write such a tool, this is wishful > thinking > >> and the result is that we stick to the mailing list workflow. > >> > > > >Can you explain your disapproval? Is it that it needs work? Or money? Or > do > >you just think it's a bad idea? Or something else? > > There is no technical plan how that would actually work in practice, and I > don't think it is even feasible. Not to speak of a realistic plan who would > actually implement it and in what time frame. > To clarify: I myself much prefer gitlab's workflow and would use that if it was available. I think providing a CLI-based workflow (which Anton and some others have requested) is feasible and fair. If an email variant thereof can be made and someone wants to fund it, I think that's reasonable. But it shouldn't block allowing more people to convert to a gitlab-style workflow, which I consider far superior over what we have now. End of clarification. Ronald _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list [email protected] https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
