On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 2:20 PM Nicolas George <[email protected]> wrote:
> Andreas Rheinhardt (12024-03-08): > > What maintenance cost and complexity are you referring to? I checked and > > could not find a single commit where one had to fix an ff_get_buffer() > > to ff_thread_get_buffer() because it has been forgotten when the decoder > > has been declared to support frame threading. > > Welcome to the new FFmpeg, where absolute consistency, i.e. catering for > hypothetical mediocre contributors, is more important than easy > optimizations and new approaches. > > And if you do not like it, “shut up, I'm on the TC and I won't recuse”. > > And if you do not like that, “shut up, I'm on the CC too”. > Is this first time I 100% agree on something with my archenemy? > > Regards, > > -- > Nicolas George > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe". > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list [email protected] https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
