Le sunnuntaina 3. maaliskuuta 2024, 4.53.01 EET Michael Niedermayer a écrit :
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 11:44:36PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >
> > doc/community.texi | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> I intend to apply the patchset tomorrow if there are no objections
You can't have a strict rule ("must") requiring something vague ("best for the
project").
What is best for the project tomorrow may differ from today. What is best for
the project w.r.t. Linux distributions may differ from that w.r.t. Windows
users. What is best for long term maintainability and sustainability of the
project does not align with the best publicity and functionality in the short
term. It is also inherently both subjective and unknowable.
This sentence just creates fodder for future accusations of bad faith,
hypocrisy, misjudgement against TC decisions. While the sentence is meaning
well, it adds absolutely nothing of value.
--
Rémi Denis-Courmont
http://www.remlab.net/
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
[email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
