> -----Original Message----- > From: ffmpeg-devel <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Anton > Khirnov > Sent: 2023年11月11日 15:58 > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Repeat vote: GA voters list updates > > Quoting Thilo Borgmann via ffmpeg-devel (2023-11-11 08:22:19) > > Hi, > > > > in [1] JB listed his list of authorized voters for the "GA voters list > > updates" > > vote. > > > > This list does not correlate with the list Josh provided in [2]. > > The word 'correlate' does not mean what you seem to think it means. The > list does correlate. > > > Neither does this list of 51 people [1] correlate to the 54 authorized > > voters > > (distinct email addresses) the CIVS system actually counted, see [3]. > > > > This can mean only one of two things, either some people on the list in [1] > > did > > receive more than one ballot, or JB failed to list all the authorized > > voters and > > ballots have been given to unknown people. Both possibilities are > > unacceptable > > flaws for a democratic vote. > > > > As the admin responsible of the votes it is my duty to have supervision of > > all > > polls and thus it is my duty to declare this vote null and void for the > > flaws > > given above. > > I am not aware of anyone having given you the right to do this. > > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > This list contains at least two duplicates, easily found by inspection. > This gives me zero confidence that any hypothetical new vote would be > any more reliable than the old one. > > Also as I said before, option A won its contests against options B/C/D > by 17/7, 23/1, and 17/7, respectively. You would thus need to change 10 > votes to have any chance of a different result. As the number of > disputed voters is nowhere near 10, there is no point in repeating > anything.
I abstain if there will another vote. I can't believe how much time have been taken on this than do some real work, like coding and patch review, and improve the situation of patch review. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list [email protected] https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
