On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 5:22 PM Nicolas George <[email protected]> wrote:
> Mark Gaiser (12022-12-28): > > There's definitely multiple things going on but it's not what you > summarize. > > You forgot the bit where “MU” told you your proposal was mostly > redundant, too limited and ad-hoc and would have security implications > if more generic, and “DEV” conveniently ignored it. > > Ok, that made me laugh :) Please correct me as I'm probably wrong. But where did anyone say that there was a working alternative solution that did not require customizing how ffmpeg is used? Like disabling safe. I intend for this to be there by default. > -- > Nicolas George > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe". > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list [email protected] https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
