Hi,

2015-03-12 16:29 GMT+01:00 Michael Niedermayer <[email protected]>:
> from "(mx >> 2) << pixel_shift)" a compiler could imply that
> (mx >> 2) is >= 0 as the alterantive is undefined

Well, (mvx >> 2) is implementation-defined, according to 6.5.7. But
gcc produces the same instruction, so...

-- 
Christophe
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to