On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 3:21 AM Michael Niedermayer <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 01:24:42PM +0530, [email protected] wrote: > > From: Gautam Ramakrishnan <[email protected]> > > > > I have attempted to write a JPEG2000 Parser. Have tested > > by generating a file containing 14 frames, as mentioned > > by Micheal. Have also tried testing with various packet > > sizes by setting -frame_size option. > > --- > > libavcodec/Makefile | 1 + > > libavcodec/jpeg2000_parser.c | 190 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > libavcodec/parsers.c | 1 + > > 3 files changed, 192 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 libavcodec/jpeg2000_parser.c > > The code seems to work fine, is there a reason why it has a "RFC" in the > subject. That is, should this be reviewed & applied or not yet ? I wanted to get the fate test also reviewed. If this looks fine to everyone, this can be applied and the FATE test can be reviewed separately. > > thx > > [...] > -- > Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB > > Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad > people will find a way around the laws. -- Plato > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
-- ------------- Gautam | _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list [email protected] https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
