On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 08:31:16AM +0000, Paul B Mahol wrote: > On 2/28/15, Clement Boesch <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 10:38:32AM +0100, Clement Boesch wrote: > >> --- > >> libavcodec/avuienc.c | 2 +- > >> libavcodec/libopenjpegenc.c | 4 ++-- > >> libavcodec/libtheoraenc.c | 2 +- > >> libavcodec/libutvideoenc.cpp | 2 +- > >> libavcodec/libvpxenc.c | 2 +- > >> libavcodec/proresenc_anatoliy.c | 2 +- > >> libavcodec/proresenc_kostya.c | 2 +- > >> libavcodec/r210enc.c | 2 +- > >> libavcodec/utvideoenc.c | 2 +- > >> libavcodec/v210enc.c | 2 +- > >> libavcodec/v308enc.c | 2 +- > >> libavcodec/v408enc.c | 2 +- > >> libavcodec/v410enc.c | 2 +- > >> libavcodec/xfaceenc.c | 2 +- > >> libavcodec/y41penc.c | 2 +- > >> libavcodec/yuv4enc.c | 2 +- > >> 16 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > >> > > > > Mmh actually this actually fails for at least r210... > > > It does not fail here. > Patchset ok.
I was confused by the output of FATE, it's not in r210, it's in prores:
*avctx->coded_frame = *pic;
This definitely causes problems. I need to check other encoders. I don't
know what to do to fix this particular case.
[...]
--
Clément B.
pgp4daat1YPXg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list [email protected] http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
