On 30/09/14 10:46 PM, Manfred Georg wrote: > Sure, I've made the change to the comment within my local code. I'm sorry, > but I'm not familiar with FFmpeg development cycle: how would you like me > to post it? > 1) A patch on top of the patch that is already in this thread (i.e. > something that will be squished into this patch). > 2) A new patch in a new thread. > 3) A new patch in this thread. > 4) Something else.
New patch in this thread, as a reply to either the mail that reviewed/asked for changes, or to the first version you sent. Starting a new thread is ok when you're posting a new iteration of an entire patchset, since it's cleaner and easier to follow on email clients that sort by thread. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list [email protected] http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
